Abstract
Background: Agathosma betulina (P.J. Bergius) Philans and Agathosma crenulata (L.) Pillans are species known as Buchu in Khoi, ‘boegoe’ or ‘bergboegoe’ in Afrikaans and ‘ibuchu’ in isiXhosa. Traditionally, buchu has served as an antipyretic, antispasmodic, diuretic, treatment for constipation, and unrinary tract infections.
Aim: The aim of this review is to contribute to the better understanding of the cultivation practices and phytochemical constituents of buchu.
Setting: This review provides an overview of cultivation practices and phytochemical composition of A. betulina and A. crenulata.
Method: A comprehensive search was conducted on existing literature on the traditional uses, medicinal use, cultivation, and phytochemistry of A. betulina and A. crenulata in online databases.
Results: Buchu is highly valued for its oil, and used globally in culinary and cosmetic industries for its flavour and aroma. Rising demand for its essential oils and therapeutic products in the early 2000s led to overharvesting, threatening natural populations. To address this, cultivation was encouraged, but limited knowledge of its cultivation methods raises concerns about the impact of further commercial expansion on the species and its ecosystem. Buchu contains bioactive compounds such as diosphenol, menthone, and pulegone, which have demonstrated antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties in preclinical studies.
Conclusion: Further research should focus on cultivation practices, non-volatile constituents, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical research of the species health benefits.
Contribution: Bioprospecting for new health-promoting items needed in the primary healthcare delivery system can benefit from this study’s addition to the body of knowledge already available on the two commercially available buchu plants.
Keywords: Buchu; cultivation practices; phytochemical composition; therapeutic properties; overexploitation.
Introduction
Agathosma betulina (P.J. Bergius) Pillans and A. crenulata (L.) Pillans, known as buchu, have a long history of use in traditional South African medicine. Buchu is particularly widespread in the mountains of the Western Cape Province. These plants are perennial shrubs, from the Rutaceae family. Among the 150 Agathosma species, A. betulina (round-leaf buchu) and A. crenulata (oval-leaf buchu) are the most prominent, used both locally and internationally, with A. betulina being widely available in the market than A. crenulata (Abe & Jordaan 2016). Agathosma betulina is a re-sprouting, fragrant shrub that grows up to 2 m, while A. crenulata is a woody, pungently aromatic, single-stemmed shrub reaching 2.5 m in height (Moolla & Viljoen 2008). The leaves of both species release strong-smelling volatiles from visible pellucid oil glands when crushed (Figure 1) (Moolla & Viljoen 2008). According to Van Wyk (2011), buchu, which was initially utilised by the Khoisan in the 1650s, had a significant role in their culture and has been grown since the 1970s or earlier. Traditionally, buchu has served as an antipyretic, antispasmodic, diuretic, cough remedy, treatment for constipation, prostatitis, rheumatism, and urinary tract infections (Mavimbela, Viljoen & Vermaak 2014; Moolla & Viljoen 2008; Sandasi et al. 2023). While the volatile oil components of A. betulina and A. crenulata have been widely investigated, the non-volatile components have received less attention, despite A. betulina’s great commercial value (Moolla et al. 2007). The presence of proteins, glycosides, tannins, saponins, alkaloids, and flavonoids were revealed through phytochemical screening of the ethanol extract. These are non-volatile fraction of A. betulina that are not well studied (Chiguvare et al. 2016). There are numerous buchu products in the market, including teas, capsules, and herbal water, which claim to have a medicinal effect because of non-volatile components (Brendler & Abdel-Tawab 2022; Sandasi et al. 2023). Agathosma betulina essential oil is recommended for use because of its low concentration of pulegone (< 5%) compared to the > 30% found in A. crenulata (Mavimbela et al. 2014). Pulegone is hepatotoxic, its oxidative metabolites (e.g., menthofuran) create covalent bonds with cellular proteins and depleting hepatic glutathione, leading to liver injury (Kleiner 2018). Therefore, this review highlights the important aspects to consider when cultivating buchu plant species.
 |
FIGURE 1: Prominent round, translucent oil glands on the abaxial leaf surface. |
|
Methods
A comprehensive literature search on cultivation practices, traditional and medicinal uses, and phytochemical properties of A. betulina and A. crenulata was conducted using various online databases including Science Direct, Scopus, Google Scholar, and JSTOR. In addition, the Tshwane University of Technology EBSCO Information Services database was also used for data collection, including the libraries, pre-electronic sources such as books, journal articles, book chapters, theses, dissertation, and other scientific publications.
Review findings
Buchu distribution
Buchu is endemic to the Fynbos biome in the Cape Floristic Region areas of the Western Cape Province of South Africa. The plant grows in a Mediterranean region, which is characterised by hot dry summers and winter rainfall ranging from 400 mm to 700 mm (Muller 2015). Agathosma betulina distribution range is from the Cederberg Mountains, east of Clanwilliam and Citrusdal, to the Groot Winterhoek Mountains, which include the Piketberg Mountain (Goldblatt & Manning 2000) (Figure 2). The plant thrives in dry environments (between October and March) and can be found in fynbos habitats on sunny rocky sandstone slopes at altitudes ranging from 300 m to 700 m above sea, where other crops will not succeed (Moolla & Viljoen 2008). Agathosma crenulata grows on lower slopes from the Paarl area to the Kleinrivier Mountains in the Overberg to the province’s east, on lower slopes and valleys on more moist sites (Goldblatt & Manning 2000).
 |
FIGURE 2: Geographical distribution map of A. betulina or round-leaf ‘buchu’ (top shading [red]) and A. crenulata or oval-leaf ‘buchu’ (bottom shading [green]) native to South Africa. |
|
Taxonomic and botanical description
Buchu nomenclature has evolved, and species identification was challenging because of historical references that omit taxonomic sources. Multiple taxonomists named and re-named the species, in 1756 Linné first recorded the genus as Diosma, specifically D. crenulata and D. crenata, followed by Thunberg in his Prodromus, later Ecklon and Zeyher provided detailed botanical and geographical data and introduced the genus as Barosma. Later, the taxonomist, Pillans, re-named the genus Agathosma in 1950 (Brendler & Abdel-Tawab 2022). Buchu is an evergreen perennial shrub with woody branches and small, pale green leaves 20 mm long, leathery, and glossy, with a blunt, strongly curved tip, and a finely toothed margin (Figure 3). Agathosma betulina has round-flat leaves (Figure 4), while A. crenulata has long oval leaves (Figure 4) and this remains the only way to tell the two are different (Mavimbela et al. 2014). The leaf margins and lower leaf surface are scattered with translucent oil glands (Moolla & Viljoen 2008; Witbooi et al. 2017). The leaves are strongly aromatic, with peppermint-like odour and the oil is golden in colour (Sandasi et al. 2023). It has large flowers, typically soilitary, star-shaped with five petals, found in the leaf axils and varies in colour from white to purplish-pink. The two species bears brown, five chambered with horn-like tips fruits, producing one seed per capsule after flowering between August and September (Van Wyk 2017; Witbooi et al. 2017). The seeds are small, oval-shaped, and have a dark brown to black colour (Figure 5).
 |
Figure 3: Buchu Agathosma betulina shrub growing in the wild: (a) under cultivation (buchu moon farm) and; (b) natural habitat (Groot Winterhoek: 32°59’ 53 S” 19°03’29.0” E). |
|
 |
Figure 4: The oval and flat leaves: (a) Agathosma betulina; (b) Agathosma crenulata. |
|
 |
Figure 5: Agathosma betulina seeds taken in Skimmelberg. |
|
Growth requirements of buchu
Buchu is a member of the fynbos vegetation, with a fire-prone life span of 10–15 years, turning woody as it ages. The two species prefer full sun for successful growth and development (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). The commercial cultivation of buchu started in the 1920s following research work by the Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden results (Witbooi 2013). However, information on the growth requirements of buchu, especially on water, soil, and nutrients, is still scanty. Numerous species of buchu are limited to specific soil types (acidic), aspects, elevations, and climates. Buchu grows naturally on south-west facing slopes at a specified altitude range of 1737 to 2028 m above sea level (Ntwana 2007). Agathosma betulina prefers higher elevations with slightly cooler, drier climates, well drained rocky soils in the fynbos, while A. crenulata prefers lower elevations near rivers and in moist, fertile soils, although it is still found in fynbos (Muller 2015).
Soil requirements
Buchu thrives in soils similar to those of other fynbos plants, which are generally infertile, nutrient-poor, coarsely graded, and acidic (Manning 2018; Witbooi 2013). The ecology of the vegetation of the infertile sandy soil is delicate; disturbance and limited range endanger the species (Silveira et al. 2016). Fynbos soil is nutrient-deficient because it originates from low-nutrient rocks, primarily quartzites and hard sandstones (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). The mountain soils where buchu grows are typically shallow, rocky, sandy, and acidic (Ntwana 2007; Ntwana, Agenbag & Langenhoven 2011). It grows naturally in soils that range from sandy to sandy loam (De Villiers 2007). However, according to Ntwana (2007), light-to-medium loam soils that are deep reddish are ideal for buchu growth. Buchu plants do not tolerate saline soils; a minimum of 600 mm of well-drained soil is required for cultivation (Ntwana 2007). Ntwana et al. (2011) reported that soil analyses were carried out in 11 sites of the Cederberg Mountains where buchu grows naturally, and a p-value below 8 mg kg–1(Bray II) was found (De Villiers 2007; Ntwana et al. 2011). The environment in which buchu grows naturally was found to have moderate amounts (0.51%) of potassium (K) (Ntwana et al. 2011). The calcium content was found to be low from all the sites (0.14 cmol [+] kg–1). The soil mineral analysis indicated low levels of sodium and exchangeable magnesium. Furthermore, the levels of manganese ranged between 4 mg kg–1 and 29.8 mg kg–1 at all the sites. Manganese levels are considered acceptable for plants between the range of 5 mg kg–1 and 140 mg kg–1 (Sillanpää 1982). Levels of copper were significantly low (<1 mg kg–1) (Ntwana et al. 2011).
Ntwana, Agenbag and Langenhoven (2013) found that growth and the highest biomass accumulation were achieved in acidic pH treatments, suggesting that buchu performs well in such environments. Buchu plants grow on acidic soils with pH levels ranging from 3.5 to 4.5, with a maximum of 5.5; pH levels between 7 and 7.99 are not advised for healthy growth and high yields because they lead to stunting and less bushy plants and, consequently, lower yields (Ntwana et al. 2013). The pH range of 6–6.99 was determined to be the overall upper limit for appropriate growth, while 4–4.99 was shown to be the ideal pH range; however, at this ideal pH range, the pulegone concentration was higher than the permitted range of 0–5% (Ntwana et al. 2013), thus, decreasing the marketable quality of the oil.
Climatic requirements
Buchu thrives in the Western Cape’s Mediterranean environment, with hot dry summers and rainy winters from May to September (Muller 2015). The winter season in this area is typically pleasant, apart from elevated regions where night temperatures may drop below freezing and periodic snowfalls on mountain summits that can last for weeks. The rainfall regime in the Cape Fynbos region varies. The rainfall pattern is orographic, meaning that precipitation increases with altitude and the rain shadow effect is more prominent than typical (Bradshaw & Cowling 2014). These regions experience 400 mm – 1700 mm of yearly precipitation throughout the winter (Van Wilgen et al. 2010).
Water requirements
Witbooi (2013) observed that buchu needs a moderate-to-high water supply. Buchu plants require an average of 6000 mL – 7000 mL of water per week by drip irrigation during the summer months (Muller 2015). Mature plants require no more than 5000 mL of water per plant, once a week in the evening (DAFF 2011). Irrigating at night lowers the risk of fungal diseases and increases water absorption. Drip irrigation is recommended because it allows control over the volume and location of water per plant and lowers evaporation loss in windy places, among other factors (DAFF 2011). Seedling establishment requires adequate water; therefore, it is best to transplant after good rains. Irrigation water should be of high quality, with minimal chlorine and salinity (DAFF 2011).
Plant nutrition
Research on buchu’s water and nutritional needs is still emerging, but balanced fertilisation is recommended to support growth by ensuring essential nutrients are supplied (De Villiers 2007). However, commercial growers lack specific fertility guidelines. Fynbos soils in the Mediterranean climate are nutrient-poor, particularly in macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, as well as micronutrients such as iron and magnesium (Abanda, Compton & Hannigan 2011; Sardans & Penuelas 2013). Fynbos soils often have low nitrogen (below 5 mg/kg) and phosphorus (2 mg/kg – 10 mg/kg) levels, which are inadequate for optimal plant growth (De Villiers 2007). Phosphorus can enhance buchu growth and essential oil yield, with recommended levels for A. betulina at 10 mg/kg – 15 mg/kg phosphorus and 10 mg/kg – 15 mg/kg nitrogen to avoid excessive vegetative growth (De Villiers & Du Preez 2005). The nutrient-poor fynbos biome, shaped by recurring fires and nutrient-leached soils, evolved to adapt to such conditions (Fouche 2023; Linder 2003). Fire is crucial for mineralisation, releasing nutrients from biomass back into the soil (Kraaij & Van Wilgen 2014; Van Wilgen et al. 2010). After fires, fynbos soils experience nutrient flushes, particularly of nitrogen and phosphorus, which temporarily boosts soil fertility (Schaller et al. 2015).
Plant propagation
Small-scale farmers, home gardeners, and medicinal plant nurseries frequently employ the conventional propagation techniques, which include vegetative and seed multiplication. However, these techniques are frequently hindered by issues such as stem cutting rooting problems, seed dormancy, and loss of seed viability (Fajinmi, Olarewaju & Van Staden 2023). Buchu seed germination is difficult, and cuttings have a lower rooting percentage (25%) than the commercially viable 40% (Blomerus 2002; Karsen 2003; Witbooi et al. 2017).
Seed propagation
Buchu’s propagation is limited by seed availability; the seeds are dispersed through ballistic dispersal upon ripening (Ntwana 2007). Harvesting seeds from fully mature capsules between October and December yields better germination rates and to ensure a good percentage (40–60) of viable seeds, regular intervals are recommended as capsules shed seeds over time (Karsen 2003; Moolla & Viljoen 2008; Ntwana 2007). Seed harvesting must occur at the optimal period (November–December) for maximum seed viability (Littlejohn 2001). To promote germination, smoke treatment should be conducted in a covered environment with adequate light during the month of March, air movement, and a humid environment, as fynbos species such as buchu are adapted to fire (Xaba & Lucas 2009). Fire events in late summer to early autumn stimulate germination across many fynbos species (Brown & Duncan 2006; Kraaij & Van Wilgen 2014).
Vegetative propagation
Buchu can be propagated from cuttings (Karsen 2003). The advantage of cuttings over seedlings is that they grow into larger flowering plants more quickly. Semi-hardwood cuttings with a length of 50 mm – 70 mm from the current season’s growth were harvested from September to November:
To prepare the cuttings, cuts are carefully made below a node, and the bottom third of the leaves are removed. Cut ends are dipped in auxin to promote rooting. The cutting trays were placed in a well-aerated propagation unit with a bottom heat of 24 °C and intermittent misting. Rooting occurred in 9 to 11 weeks. (Karsen 2003)
In addition Karsen, found that applying 500 ppm – 1000 ppm indole butyric (IBA) resulted in a rooting percentage of 40% – 45% and concluded that a rooting success of 40% is commercially viable. For successful nursery propagation, a minimum rooting percentage of 80% is considered optimum (Malan & Blomerus 2012). According to Karsen (2003), ‘buchu cuttings are naturally slow to root, hence poor rooting results are connected to the cutting’s ability to live long enough for rooting to occur’. Blomerus, Coetzee and Reinten (2001) found that the timing of the cutting is important; this is achieved after flowering when the plant produces new shoots, which are ideal for tip-, stem-, or heel cuttings. Another factor that may contribute to poor rooting in cuttings is the challenge of managing infections, even with proper sanitation measures (Malan & Blomerus 2012).
Micropropagation
Witbooi et al. (2017) conducted a study with the goal of creating a micropropagation protocol for A. betulina. Through physical scarification and smoke-water treatments, the scientists discovered an efficient in vitro seed germination strategy that resulted in healthy seedlings that could be transplanted ex situ. In buchu nodal explants, a highly significant multiple shoot multiplication was seen utilising 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (1962) in addition to plant growth regulators (PGRs). After testing three PGRs, they discovered that 2, 4-D, at a dose of 4.5 µM, was the most effective for initiating shoots. The highest percentage of shoot proliferation was observed in explants grown on half-strength MS medium supplemented with a combination of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and N6-benzyladenine (BA). Phytochemical analysis revealed that the callus from the nodal explants of buchu grown on MS media supplemented with NAA had the highest accumulation of limonene.
Harvesting
Harvesting buchu leaves at an inappropriate time diminishes their quality and shortens the plant’s lifespan (Ntwana et al. 2013). Buchu should be collected throughout the months of January to March (De Ponte Machado 2003). In addition, in an earlier study it was reported that the optimal time to harvest is in February. This is because of the low pulegone concentration at this time of year (Table 1). Pulegone levels are influenced by different factors such as time of harvesting, the nutrition levels, and plant age (Dlamini & Moyo, 2017; Ntwana et al. 2013). To ensure sustainable harvesting, guidelines recommend avoiding collection during flowering, allowing sufficient regrowth, and limiting harvest to once every 2 years (Ntwana 2007). However, with the growing demand, this is not commercially sustainable (Crouch & Van Wyk 2010). Agathosma betulina is a re-sprouter; it can be sustainably harvested by cutting the shoots and branches above the base by the internodes, thus allowing new growth. Agathosma crenulata is a re-seeder and has a slow recovery; therefore, a cutting is made carefully to allow enough growth for seed production.
| TABLE 1: Seasonal variations in pulegone levels of Agathosma betulina essential oil as percentage of total fractions measured. |
Pests and diseases
Information about diseases and pests that affect buchu is scarce. The most common pests or insects seen on A. betulina plants are cutworms, soft scale, plant lice, hard scale (dopluis), root-knot nematodes, snails, ants, leaf miners, stem-borer beetles, and harvester termites (DAFF 2011). Buchu is sensitive to the soil-borne fungus Phytophthora cinnamonnii and Fusarium wilt disease, both of which attack fynbos species and cause plant harm (Xaba & Lucas 2009).
Phytochemistry
When planning to produce buchu, one of the aspects that need to be considered is the essential oil quality (Ntwana 2007; Tadmore et al. 2002). Higher education, growing consumer health and environmental concerns, sustainable harvesting practices, and genetic diversity loss have all contributed to the desire for natural plant products that are effective, safe, and clean (Trinder-Smith & Raimondo 2016). It is also vital to realise that overseas markets expect high-quality products. As a result, buchu quality control is often a critical measure in its production, given that the major consumers of buchu are primarily in the international markets (Baard 2023).
Volatile constituents
Buchu has an essential oil that is characterised by a peppermint-like aroma and known to have mild antiseptic and weak diuretic qualities (Ntwana 2007). Large circular cells beneath the leaf’s epidermis are where the volatile oil builds up and is contained; however, A. betulina produces a larger percentage of this oil than A. crenulata (Ntwana 2007). Isomenthone, menthone, diosphenol, pulegone, limonene, 4-hydroxydiosphenol, 8-mercapto-p-menthan-3-one, 8-acetylthio-p-menthan-3-one, 8-methylthio-p-menthan-3-one, pseudo-diosphenol, and 1-hydroxydiosphenol are the major marker compounds found in the essential oil profile of A. betulina (Van Wyk 2011). Agathosma crenulata was found to contain limonene, menthone, a trace of diosphenol, and large amounts of l-pulegone (Moolla & Viljoen 2008). Table 2 presents a list of key compounds found in the two commercial buchu species.
| TABLE 2: Relative percentage (%) and major compounds identified in the essential oil of A. betulina and A. crenulata. |
The buchu volatile component, monoterpene diosphenol, is thought to be the reason for its urinary tract antiseptic actions (Ntwana 2007). Two chemotypes of A. betulina have been identified: the diosphenol chemotype and the isomenthone chemotype (Collins et al. 1996). The diosphenol chemotype is characterised by high levels of Ψ-diosphenol and diosphenol (exceeding 0.5% and 12%, respectively) and low concentrations of isomenthone and menthone (below 29% and 9.6%, respectively). In contrast, the isomenthone chemotype exhibits an opposite profile, with isomenthone and menthone concentrations exceeding 31% and 27%, respectively, and diosphenol levels below 0.14% (Collins et al. 1996; Posthumus et al. 1996; Viljoen et al. 2006). Although the diosphenol chemotype is preferred for its elevated diosphenol content, both chemotypes produce highly aromatic essential oils containing less than 5% pulegone (Blommaert & Bartel 1976; Moolla & Viljoen 2008).
The geographical distribution of these two chemotypes is different. The isomenthone chemotype is primarily found on the northern and western slopes of the Piketberg Mountains, while the diosphenol chemotype is primarily found in the mountain’s surroundings, Citrusdal (Ntwana 2007). Collins et al. (1996) observed no significant relationship between oil content and chemotype geographic origin. These authors determined that genetics are more important than environmental variables. The conclusion was thus made because all A. betulina plants with low diosphenol isomers were discovered in the Piketberg mountain range, but not all Piketberg plants had low diosphenol content. Agathosma crenulata is not suited for medicinal utilisation because it contains less diosphenol and more pulegone (Collins et al. 1996). Agathosma betulina oil has a 53:47 equilibrium mixture of Ψ-diosphenol and diosphenol as well as pulegone, limonene, and menthone as major constituents (Sandasi et al. 2023; Schneider & Viljoen 2002).
Non-volatile constituents
The non-volatile fraction of A. betulina is not well studied; however, phytochemical screening of the ethanol extract revealed the presence of various metabolites (Chiguvare et al. 2016).
Flavonoids such as diosmin, rutin, kaempferol, quercetin, and hesperidin were identified in the methanol extract of buchu (Brendler & Abdel-Tawab 2022). Agathosma crenulata contains a higher concentration of rutin and a lower concentration of quercetin-dimethyl ether-glucoside as compared to A. betulina. These flavonoids have antioxidant properties and guard the cells against the harmful unstable oxygen molecules (Brendler & Abdel-Tawab 2022).
Therapeutic and nutritional value of buchu
The Agathosma species is rich in flavonoids such as diosmin, hesperidin, rutin, and quercetin, along with mucilage and resins, which exhibit strong antioxidant effects (Li & Schluesener 2017; Mahmoud et al. 2019). These compounds function through various mechanisms to neutralise free radicals (Moolla & Viljoen 2008; Moolla et al. 2007). Buchu essential oils and extracts show activity against specific pathogens, including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Bacillus cereus, with greater effectiveness against gram-positive bacteria than gram-negative ones (Moolla et al. 2007; Viljoen et al. 2006). These oils also influence biofilm formation by hindering bacterial attachment. Several researchers have found that Agathosma species contain coumarins and phenolic compounds with benzene and α-pyrone rings, which exhibit antimicrobial properties by stimulating macrophages (Moolla et al. 2007; Sandasi, Leonard & Viljoen 2008; Viljoen et al. 2006).
The oil distilled from buchu leaves is therapeutically beneficial, notably for treating kidney and urinary tract infections, as well as haematuria and prostatitis (Moolla & Viljoen 2008). Diospenol is responsible for the diuretic effects of buchu, with both diospenol and flavonoids contributing to increased urine production by irritating the gallbladder (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1962). Buchu oil has limonene, which is known for its anti-inflammatory effects. The essential oils have been shown to inhibit leukotriene synthesis by blocking the enzyme 5-lipoxygenase. Limonene also helps reduce the biosynthesis of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (Moolla et al. 2007; Van Wyk et al. 2011; Viljoen et al. 2006). The monoterpene thiol 9-mercapto-p-menthan-3-one is a key component contributing to buchu oil’s distinctive aroma. It plays a crucial role in the plant’s scent and flavour as a sulphur-containing terpene (Moolla et al. 2007). Buchu has a naturally minty, sweet berry, apricot, peach, and green herbal taste, with its oils commonly used in perfumes and colognes (Moolla & Viljoen, 2008; Moolla et al. 2007). The Agathosma species is also used in the treatment of arthritis and rheumatism by reducing uric acid levels. In addition, it is used to treat gastrointestinal problems, including flatulence, diarrhoea, and nausea (spasmolytic effects) (Bajpayee et al. 2012; Moolla & Viljoen 2008; Moolla et al. 2007).
Implications and recommendations
Discussion and future research
Buchu (A. betulina and A. crenulata) has a long history of medicinal use among South Africa’s indigenous people, which drives its current popularity. Rising demand from traditional healers, herbalists, researchers, and international markets has led to a decline in wild populations, posing a risk of extinction if unsustainable harvesting continues (Trinder-Smith & Raimondo 2016). Therefore, sustainable cultivation is essential as an optimal conservation strategy, supporting successful commercialisation. However, research on cultivation practices is still lacking. Ntwana et al. (2013) studied the effects of pH on the growth, mineral content, and essential oil quality of A. betulina under controlled conditions, which has improved our understanding of its growth across various pH levels. Approximately 20 000 plants can be cultivated per hectare, yielding about 1% oil (Sandasi et al. 2023). The estimated annual production per annum is 300 tonnes, with 50 tonnes being sold on the domestic market and 250 tonnes being exported (Sandasi et al. 2023). Despite documented phytochemical differences, research gaps remain regarding buchu’s medicinal benefits and cultivation. Addressing this gap is crucial for advancing research and reducing the overharvesting of wild buchu plants. The antioxidant compounds in A. betulina, such as hesperidin and diosmin, show potential benefits for reducing degenerative disease risks, including cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Further studies on these benefits could support its use as a preventive health supplement.
Conclusion
Buchu has a long history as a remedy for various ailments and is undoubtedly one of South Africa’s most significant medicinal plants and export products. Despite its well-established use, the cultivation practices and biological activity of buchu remain underexplored. While pharmaceutical research has been conducted on buchu, most of these studies are in vitro and few have verified its traditional uses. Unlike the detailed data available on the volatile (essential oil) components, the non-volatile compounds of A. betulina and A. crenulata have not been thoroughly studied. The growing interest in buchu for the flavour and fragrance industry, both locally and internationally, is expected to drive further research into this versatile and ethnomedicinally important species. Although the benefits of buchu have been recognised for a long time, its use has yet to become mainstream because of the need for definitive research to validate its advantages. Sustainable cultivation of this plant would facilitate more detailed research in a shorter timeframe. Given its numerous benefits, it would be worthwhile to investigate all its properties to maximise its potential while also ensuring the conservation of this valuable medicinal plant.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Tshwane University of Technology, Soil and Water Division at Agricultural Research Council Infruitec Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, South Africa, and the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) for their immense contributions towards achieving this work.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Authors’ contributions
N.H.M. designed the study, was involved in the investigation and data collection (articles), carried out a comprehensive review, and drafted the original article. R.P.G. was involved in the supervision, providing resources, methodology, reviewing, and editing. C.B. was involved in methodology formation, supervision, and writing – reviewing and editing. N.M.M. was involved in the methodology process, visualisation, validation, securing resources, supervision, and writing – reviewing and editing of the article, as well as funding acquisition. R.A.M. was involved in the supervision, reviewing and editing, and funding acquisition. L.B. and P.A.K. were responsible for the writing, reviewing, and editing of the article. M.M.M., S.A., and D.M. were responsible for reviewing and editing the article and funding acquisition.
Ethical considerations
Ethical waiver to conduct this study was obtained from the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) editor in chief dated 05 February 2025.
Funding information
The authors have reported that they received funding from the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) and the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD), which may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed publication. The authors have disclosed those interests fully and have implemented an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from their involvement. The terms of these funding arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the affiliated university in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings are available in the online database.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, or agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.
References
Abanda, P.A., Compton, J.S. & Hannigan, R.E., 2011, ‘Soil nutrient content, above-ground biomass and litter in a semi-arid shrubland, South Africa’, Geoderma 164(3–4), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.015
Abe, B.T. & Jordaan, J.A., 2016, ‘Identifying agathosma leaves using hyperspectral imagery and classification techniques’, in S.I. Ao, C. Douglas & W.S. Grundfest (eds.), Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, vol. 1, San Francisco, CA, October 19–21, 2016, pp. 476–479.
Baard, C.B., 2023, ‘Implementing conservation in the cederberg mountain range: The role of the buchu (Agathosma Betulina) sector’, M.Phil. dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Bajpayee, P., Kumar, K., Sharma, S., Maurya, N., Kumar, P., Singh, R. & Lal, C., 2012, ‘Prostatitis: Prevalence, health impact and quality improvement strategies’, Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica: Drug Research 69(4), 571–579.
Blomerus, L., 2002, Buchu awareness pamphlet, Agricultureal Research Council (ARC-LNR), Elsenburg.
Blomerus, L., Coetzee. C. & Reinten, E., 2001, ‘Buchu – Aspects of propagation to assist commercialisation on of new indigenous crop. In New crops & new uses: Strength in diversity’, in J. Janick & A. whipkey (eds.), in National symposium, Atlanta, GA, November 10–12, 2001, pp. 1–9.
Blommaert, K.L.J. & Bartel, E., 1976, ‘Chemotaxonomic aspects of the buchu species Agathosma betulina (Pillans) and Agathosma crenulata (Pillans) from local plantings’, Journal of South African Botany 42(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.397001
Bradshaw, P.L. & Cowling, R.M., 2014, ‘Landscapes, rock types, and climate of the greater cape floristic region’, in N. Allsopp, J.H. Colville & G.A. Verboom (eds.), Fynbos: Ecology, evolution, and conservation of a megadiverse region, pp. 26–46, Oxford University, New York, NY.
Brendler, T. & Abdel-Tawab, M., 2022, ‘Buchu (Agathosma betulina and A. crenulata): Rightfully forgotten or underutilized?’, Frontiers in Pharmacology 13, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.813142
Brown, N. & Duncan, G., 2006, Grow fynbos plants: A practical guide to the propagation and cultivation of plants form some of the major families of Cape Floral Region of South Africa, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town.
Chiguvare, H., Oyedeji, O.O., Matewu, R., Aremu, O., Oyemitan, I.A., Oyedeji, A.O. et al., 2016, ‘Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Buchu plant extracts and their analgesic properties’, Molecules 21(6), 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060774
Collins, N.F., Graven, E.H., Van Beek, T.A. & Lelyveld, G.P., 1996, ‘Chemotaxonomy of commercial Buchu species (Agathosma betulina and A. crenulate)’, Journal of Essential Oil Research 8(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1996.9700607
Crouch, N.R. & Van Wyk, B.E., 2010, ‘Conservation of Buchu (Agathosma betulina) in South Africa’, South African Journal of Botany 76(2), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.02.052
Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), 2011, Buchu, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Pretoria.
De Ponte Machado, M., 2003, ‘Is buchu (Agathosma betulina) harvesting sustainable? Effects of current harvesting practices on biomass, reproduction and mortality’, MSc. dissertation, University of Cape Town.
De Villiers, C.J., 2007, ‘The effect of phosphorus on the growth, plant mineral content and essential oil composition of Buchu (Agathosma betulina)’, MSc. dissertation, Stellenbosch University.
De Villiers, C.J. & Du Preez, P.P., 2005, ‘Influence of soil amendments and fertilizers on the growth and esssential oil composition of buchu (Agothosma betulina)’, South African Journal of Botany 72(2), 185–190.
Dlamini, P.V. & Moyo, M., 2017, ‘Effects of soil pH on the growth, yield, and essential oil content of Agathosma betulina (buchu)’, South African Journal of Botany 111, 94–100.
Fajinmi, O.O., Olarewaju, O.O. & Van Staden, J., 2023, ‘Propagation of medicinal plants for sustainable livelihoods, economic development, and biodiversity conservation in South Africa’, Plants 12(5), 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051174
Fouche, B., 2023 ‘Testing alternative stable state theory at Afromontane and Milkwood forest-fynbos ecotones’, MSc. dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Goldblatt, P. & Manning, J., 2000, Cape plants: A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa, National Botanical Institute, St. Louis, MO.
Karsen, P.A., 2003, ‘Rooting of buchu cuttings (Genus: Agathosma)’, MSc dissertation, Stellenbosch University.
Kleiner, D.E., 2018, ‘Drugs and toxins’, in A.D. Burt, L.D. Ferrell & S.G. Hübscher (eds.), Macsween’s pathology of the liver, pp. 673–779, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Kraaij, T. & Van Wilgen, B.W., 2014, ‘Drivers, ecology, and management of fire in fynbos’, in N. Allsopp, J.F. Colville & G.A. Verboom (eds.), Fynbos: Ecology, evolution, and conservation of a megadiverse region, pp. 47–72, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Li, C. & Schluesener, H., 2017, ‘Health-promoting effects of the citrus flavanone hesperidin’, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57(3), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.906382
Linder, H.P., 2003, ‘The radiation of the Cape flora, Southern Africa’, Biological Reviews 78(4), 597–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006171
Littlejohn, G.M., 2001, ‘Genetic resource conservation in Proteaceae: Limitations and challenges’, Acta Horticulturae 20, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.545.1
Mahmoud, A.M., Hernandez Bautista, R.J., Sandhu, M.A. & Hussein, O.E., 2019, ‘Beneficial effects of citrus flavonoids on cardiovascular and metabolic health’, Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2019(1), 5484138. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5484138
Malan, D.G. & Blomerus, L.M., 2012, ‘Effect of delayed iba treatments on rooting of protea cultivars “niobe”, “lady di”, “pinita”, ”susara” and “pink ice”’, Acta Horticulturae 1, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1031.5
Manning, J., 2018, Field guide to fynbos, 2nd edn., Penguin Random House South Africa, Cape Town.
Mavimbela, T., Viljoen, A. & Vermaak, I., 2014, ‘Differentiating between Agathosma betulina and Agathosma crenulata–A quality control perspective’, Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 1(1), e8–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2014.04.002
Moolla, A., Van Vuuren, S.F., Van Zyl, R.L. & Viljoen, A.M., 2007, ‘Biological activity and toxicity profile of 17 Agathosma (Rutaceae) species’, South African Journal of Botany 73(4), 588–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2007.05.007
Moolla, A. & Viljoen, A.M., 2008, ‘“Buchu” – Agathosma betulina and Agathosma crenulata (Rutaceae): A review’, Journal of Ethnopharmacology 119(3), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2008.07.036
Muller, C., 2015, ‘The role of buchu (Agathosma betulina & Agathosma crenulata) cultivation in livelihoods and conservation’, MSc dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Murashige, T. & Skoog, F., 1962, ‘A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue culture’, Physiologia plantarum 15(3), 473–497.
Ntwana, B., 2007, ‘Growth, mineral content and essential oil quality of buchu (Agathosma betulina) in response to ph under controlled conditions in comparison with plants from its natural habitat’, Dcoctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology.
Ntwana, B., Agenbag, G.A. & Langenhoven, P., 2011, ‘Growth, inorganic content and essential oil quality of Buchu (Agathosma betulina) found in its natural habitat in the Cederberg Mountains’, South African Journal of Plant and Soil 28(4), 213–217.
Ntwana, B., Agenbag, G.A. & Langenhoven, P., 2013, ‘Effect of pH on growth, mineral content and essential oil quality of buchu (Agathosma betulina) grown under controlled conditions’, South African Journal of Plant and Soil 30(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2013.811299
Posthumus, M.A., Van Beek, T.A., Coliins, N.F. & Graven, E.H., 1996, ‘Chemical composition of the essential oils of Agathosma betulina, A. crenulata and an A. betulina x crenulata hybrid (buchu)’, Journal of Essential Oil Research 8(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1996.9700606
Sandasi, M., Leonard, C.M. & Viljoen, A.M., 2008, ‘The effect of five common essential oil components on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms’, Food control 19(11), 1070–1075.
Sandasi, M., Kamatou, G.P., Baranska, M. & Viljoen, A.M., 2010, ‘Application of vibrational spectroscopy in the quality assessment of Buchu oil obtained from two commercially important Agathosma species (Rutaceae)’, South African Journal of Botany 76(4), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.013
Sandasi, M., Kamatou, G., Chen, W. & Mulaudzi, N., 2023, ‘Agathosma betulina’, in A. Viljoen, M. Sandasi, G. Fouche, S. Combrinck & Vermaak (eds.), The South African herbal pharmacopoeia: Monographs of medicinal and aromatic plants, pp. 41–56, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sardans, J. & Penuelas, J., 2013, ‘Plant-soil interactions in Mediterranean forest and shrublands: Impacts of climatic change’, Plant and Soil 365, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1591-6
Schaller, J., Tischer, A., Struyf, E., Bremer, M., Belmonte, D.U. & Potthast, K., 2015, ‘Fire enhances phosphorus availability in topsoils depending on binding properties’, Ecology 96(6), 1598–1606. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1311.1
Schneider, D.F. & Viljoen, M.S., 2002, ‘Stereoselective synthesis of (6R)- and (6S)diosphenol and Ψ-diosphenol’, Tetrahedron 58(26), 5307–5315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00492-1
Sillanpää, M., 1982, Micronutrients and the nutrient status of soils: A global study, vol. 48, Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Silveira, F.A., Negreiros, D., Barbosa, N.P., Buisson, E., Carmo, F.F., Carstensen, D.W. et al., 2016, ‘Ecology and evolution of plant diversity in the endangered campo rupestre: A neglected conservation priority’, Plant and Soil 403, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2637-8
Tadmor, Y., Jefthas, E., Goliath, J., Smith, M., Langenhoven, P., Acquave, D. et al., 2002, ‘Quality assurance and quality control for African natural plant products from the ground up’, in J. Janick & A. Whipkey (eds.), Trends in new crops and uses, pp. 93–97, ASHS Press, Alexandria.
Trinder-Smith, T. & Raimondo, D., 2016, Agathosma betulina (P.J.Bergius) Pillans. National assessment: Red list of South African plants version, viewed 22 May 2024, from http://redlist.sanbi.org/species.php?species=3359-22.
Van Wilgen, B.W., Forsyth, G.G., De Klerk, H., Das, S., Khuluse, S. & Schmitz, P., 2010, ‘Fire management in Mediterranean-climate shrublands: A case study from the Cape fynbos, South Africa’, Journal of Applied Ecology 47(3), 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01800.x
Van Wyk, B.E., 2011, ‘The potential of South African plants in the development of new medicinal products’, South African Journal of Botany 77(4), 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2011.08.011
Van Wyk, B.E., 2017, ‘A review of African medicinal and aromatic plants’, in M. Neffati, H. Najjaa & A. Mathe (eds.), Medicinal and aromatic plants of theWorld-Africa, vol. 3, pp. 19–60, Springer, Dordrecht.
Viljoen, A.V., Moolia, A., Van Vuuren, S.F., Van Zyl, R.L. Başer, K.H.C., Demirci, B. et al., 2006, ‘The biological activity and essential oil composition of 17 Agathosma (Rutaceae) species’, Journal of Essential Oil Research 18(suppl 1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2006.12067112
Watt, J.M. & Breyer-Brandwijk, M.G., 1962, The medicinal and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa being an account of their medicinal and other uses, chemical composition, pharmacological effects and toxicology in man and animal, 2nd edn., E & S Livingstone, Edinburgh.
Witbooi, H., 2013, ‘In vitro propagation of Agathosma betulina an indigenous plant of economic importance’, Doctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology.
Witbooi, H., Okem, A., Makunga, N.P. & Kambizi, L., 2017, ‘Micropropagation and secondary metabolites in Agathosma betulina (Berg.)’, South African Journal of Botany 111, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.015
Xaba, P. & Lucas, N., 2009, ‘Buchu’, Velf & Flora 95(3), 160–161.
|